Adding Objectivity to Qualitative Adjustments

 

Q Factors

 

While qualitative factors are indeed subjective by nature, this does not mean that the institution’s processes for documenting and justifying these adjustments should be absent of objectivity. Rather, examiners call for underlying documentation and support to defend the adjustments made in the qualitative and environmental portion of the ALLL calculation.

In order to bring objectivity to this subjective task, many institutions incorporate a qualitative scoring matrix to ensure directional consistency. Institutions also benefit from using the same sources from period to period to ensure adjustments are objective and do not vary from the use of disparate sources. What’s more, institutions can use documentation from their portfolio to cite areas of increased or decreased risk to justify their qualitative adjustments.


Related Asset - Webinar:
ALLL Qualitative Factors: Justifying in Periods of Low Loss

View The Webinar


Related Asset - Whitepaper:
ALLL Qualitative Factors: Justifying in Periods of Low Loss

ALLL Qualitative Factors: Justifying in Periods of Low Loss - Download the PDF


Related Asset - Video
The Importance of Qualitative and Environmental Risk Factors

Related Asset - Video
Justify & Support Your Qualitative Factors

Related Asset - Slides:
Documenting the 9 Qualitative Factors

View The Slides


Article Tags:


Leave A Comment

No Comments


Leave Your Comment